Hiring skilled workers in the U.S. now comes with a $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee, before a single line of code is written.
That’s the new reality of the H-1B visa, the program that powers much of American tech by bringing in engineers, developers, designers, and analysts.
Until last week, companies paid a few thousand dollars in processing costs. Then, almost overnight, the price jumped to six figures. And the rollout was chaotic.
Early reports suggested the fee would be charged annually, sparking frantic calls and emergency flights as firms rushed to get staff back on U.S. soil. A day later, the White House clarified it’s a one-time payment, and only for new applicants.
Clarification calmed nerves, but not the deeper concern.
Because here’s the real point: whether once or every year, $100,000 is a wall, not a speed bump.
The question now is how companies will adapt.
H-1B Visa Fee Impact: What Will Companies Really Do?
Big Tech companies, like Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and Meta, will grumble and pay.
In the first half of 2025, Amazon and its cloud-computing unit, AWS, had received approval for more than 12,000 H-1B visas, while Microsoft and Meta Platforms had over 5,000 H-1B visa approvals each.
So, they also would be affected.
But for a fintech in New York or a SaaS startup in Austin, $100,000 per hire is a deal-breaker.
In many markets, that amount covers a full year of salary, not just paperwork. Therefore, no VC wants to see six figures vanish into paperwork before a product even ships. It changes the math entirely.
So, we can expect lawsuits to follow; details may shift, but the signal is already clear. Building a hiring strategy on U.S. visas is no longer reliable.
That doesn’t erase the demand for engineers, analysts, or designers. It just shifts the assumption that those workers have to be in San Francisco or New York.
We’ve seen this before. When COVID froze borders, distributed teams kept the wheels turning. Many never went back.
The $100,000 visa fee is a reminder that building your workforce on U.S. visas is building on sand.
H-1B Alternatives: Why Old Hubs Are Showing Their Limits
For two decades, global hiring had a clear map. Need scale and speed? Go to India or the Philippines.
Need strong engineering with European overlap? Eastern Europe.
Need time zone convenience? Latin America.
Each region had its moment, but cracks are now showing…
- Asia’s wage curve is steepening.
India and the Philippines still dominate outsourcing by sheer scale. Yet the advantage isn’t what it was a decade ago. Median wages in India’s BPO sector rose nearly 10% in 2024, and firms are experiencing jumps in 2025.
At the same time, attrition is notoriously high: talent often leaves within 12 to 18 months, forcing companies to spend more on hiring, training, and retention. That churn erodes cost savings and hits project continuity.
Infosys and Wipro have built global empires on H-1B pipelines, but even they face rising wage pressures and attrition.
- Eastern Europe is no longer “low risk.”
Outsourcing giants like EPAM or Luxoft, long rooted in Ukraine and Poland, now contend with geopolitical risks their clients can’t ignore.
The war in Ukraine has changed perceptions. For years, Kyiv and Warsaw were pitched as reliable engineering hubs, just a short flight from London or Berlin. Now, businesses weigh geopolitical instability in every decision.
It’s not just about the frontlines; it’s about sanctions, infrastructure strain, and investor nervousness. Companies don’t like betting their growth on unpredictable geopolitics, and many quietly admit they’re diversifying away from the region.
- Latin America’s cost gap is narrowing.
LATAM’s appeal was simple: keep engineers in your time zone without paying Silicon Valley wages. But in São Paulo or Mexico City, senior developer salaries are now brushing against U.S. mid-market levels.
Outsourcing firms charge $30–$60 an hour, which is not far off from U.S. rates outside New York or San Francisco.
For many startups, the math doesn’t work anymore: if cost savings are minimal, the complexity of cross-border contracts feels less justified.
While these regions still matter, the “easy arbitrage” — reliable, cheaper, high-quality labor abroad — is slipping away.
Companies need to widen the map. Increasingly, their eyes are turning to Africa.
Why Africa Is Emerging as the Smart Alternative to H-1B Hiring
Africa is often described as “the next big thing” in talent, or worse, just “cheap labor.” Both miss the point.
Africa is not a backup plan. It’s a continent stepping into the spotlight with scale, readiness, and momentum.
- Scale is undeniable.
Africa is the youngest continent. By 2035, it will add more workers each year than the rest of the world combined. Nigeria alone is running a national program to train three million people in digital and technical skills by 2027. Universities are producing graduates at rates that outpace many European countries.
- Skills are already visible.
Nigeria’s fintechs like Paystack and Moniepoint are setting global standards in payments. Kenya’s “Silicon Savannah” has given the world M-Pesa, redefining financial inclusion. South Africa’s creative industries quietly export design talent worldwide. Egypt anchors North Africa with engineers and multilingual professionals.
These are not “what ifs”; they are live case studies.
- Economics still favors companies.
Developers in Eastern Europe command $35–$70 an hour. In Africa, the range is $10–$40. That’s a 30–50% saving, without compromising quality.
More importantly, it’s not just about being cheaper; it’s about tapping into a deep pool of educated, underemployed professionals eager for global work.
- Integration works.
English is widely spoken. Time zones align neatly with Europe and partially with the U.S. Daily stand-ups across Lagos, London, and New York aren’t theoretical; they’re happening already.
And when you strip away assumptions, Africa answers the real questions companies are asking post-fee:
- Where can we scale without burning millions in overhead?
Africa’s developer rates ($10–$40/hr) undercut Eastern Europe ($35–$70) and Latin America ($30–$60).
- Where can we integrate easily with existing operations?
English proficiency and favorable time zones make daily collaboration realistic, not forced.
- Where are ecosystems gaining, not losing, momentum?
From Lagos fintechs to Nairobi startups, Africa’s hubs are expanding while other markets plateau.
What Choices Do Companies Have After the H-1B Visa Fee?
The $100,000 H-1B fee doesn’t just add another expense to a balance sheet. It forces a choice.
For years, companies treated visa sponsorship as predictable: costly, bureaucratic, but ultimately reliable. That reliability is gone.
Even if lawsuits trim the fee or timelines shift, the signal is clear. Hiring strategies built on U.S. visas are exposed to politics in ways companies can no longer ignore.
So the decision is simple:
- Keep absorbing U.S. shocks. Pay the fee, overpay for local talent, and hope the rules don’t change again next year.
- Redraw the hiring map. Accept that the center of gravity is shifting, and build teams where talent actually is.
.
FAQs on Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
1. What is the $100,000 H-1B visa fee?
It’s a new U.S. rule announced in September 2025 that requires employers to pay $100,000 for each new H-1B visa application. The fee applies only to new applicants, not renewals or existing holders.
2. Who is most affected by the H-1B visa hike?
Startups and mid-size companies are most affected because they can’t absorb the cost. Big Tech firms like Amazon and Microsoft can pay, but smaller firms are priced out.
3. What alternatives are companies considering to the H-1B visa?
Many firms are turning to remote and offshore hiring. They’re moving beyond traditional hubs like India and Latin America and increasingly looking to Africa.
4. Why is Africa becoming a top alternative for global hiring?
Africa offers lower developer rates ($10–$40/hr), a rapidly growing workforce, and strong integration advantages like English proficiency and overlapping time zones.
Conclusion: Beyond Visas, Toward a New Talent Order
The bigger story here is not the fee itself, but the reminder it delivers: the future of global work will not be decided by immigration policy. It will be decided by where talent is scaling fastest.
And right now, no region is scaling like Africa.
The visa fee will eventually fade from the headlines. But the companies that treat it as a wake-up call and start building early in Africa’s ecosystems will own the advantage in the decade ahead.
Not because they dodged a tax. But because they recognized that the center of gravity in global talent has already shifted.
Editor’s Note: The global hiring shift is already underway. At Betternship, we connect companies with vetted African developers, designers, and digital professionals. If you’re exploring alternatives to the $100,000 H-1B visa fee, let’s talk.